The survey question for the week of 9-6-2015 prompted 17 submissions.  Half of the responses supported the public funding a soccer stadium, however people completely against or for the policy were each more than a quarter of their half.  Of course, the sample of 17 is not enough to suggest the extreme choice data means anything.
Some comments were expected such as being a sports fan or non-fan.  Some cited the potential economic development from a stadium, while others suggested the opposite and the frustration with giving money to wealthy team owners.

The economic studies strongly show the stadiums do not give a return to the public.  (The survey suggests there is an emotional factor that maybe too hard to quantify, therefore I suspect that there should be some public financial greasing to these sports projects.  The public should also get some form of financial return via a profit sharing system.

If the St. Paul site is chosen for a new soccer stadium, it would be a shame for our city to give away any form of revenue.  Consequently, if a tax break is granted by our state and city, I hope a percent of the team's profits are earmarked for us.  Such an arrangement would allow both the team and our city to predict costs/income.  After all, I feel that most businesses are more interested in reducing the variables that limit their potential profits than simply maximizing their income.



Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Leave a Reply